The Effect of PjBL with Oral Corrective Feedback on Student Scientific Article Writing Skills
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using the Project Based Learning model integrated with Oral Corrective Feedback in teaching academic writing in tertiary institutions. This form of research uses an experimental methodology and is quantitative in nature. Matching Pretest-Post-Test Control Group Design was used as the research methodology. This research data collection strategy uses tests. The test given is a performance test, in which students make scientific articles to be published in journals. The research data processing technique was SPSS 17. Based on the findings and discussion it can be concluded that the use of the PjBL model integrated with Oral Corrective Feedback is more effective than using the PjBL model alone to teach students academic writing in the field. Indonesian Language and Literature Study Program, Padang State University. The use of this model is one of the innovations in learning based on the latest curriculum by integrating innovative language learning methods in learning in tertiary institutions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Seileek, A., & Abu Sa’aleek, A. (2012). Computer assisted language learning: merits and demerits. Language in India Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, 12(4), 23–36.
Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students’ problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1, 211–221.
Al-hammadi, F., & Sidek, H. M. (2015). An analytical framework for analysing secondary EFL writing curriculum: Approaches for writing and preparation for Higher Education. International Education Studies, 8(1), 59–70.
Al-Hazzani, N., & Altalhab, S. (2018). Can explicit written corrective feedback develop grammatical and lexical accuracy of Saudi EFL learners ? International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(4), 16–24.
Al-Olimat, S. I., & Abuseileek, A. F. (2015). Using computer-mediated corrective feedback modes in developing students’ writing performance. Teaching English with Technology, 15(3), 3–30.
Altunkaya, H., & Ayranci, B. (2020). The use of Edmodo in academic writing education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712659
Argüelles, L. G., Méndez, E. H., & Escudero, M. D. P. (2019). EFL teachers’ attitudes towards oral corrective feedback: A case study. Profile: Issues Teacher’ Profesional Development, 21(1), 107–120.
Arneback, E., Englund, T., & Solbrekke, T. D. (2016). Writing in and out of control: A longitudinal study of three student teachers’ experiences of academic writing in preschool teacher education. Nordic Studies in Education, 36, 211–228.
Aseeri, F. M. M. (2019). Written corrective feedback as practiced by instructors of writing in English at Najran University. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(3), 112–121.
Ataman, D. Ş., & Mirici, İ. H. (2017). Contribution of Corrective Feedback to English Language Learners ’ Writing Skills Development through Workfolio Based Tasks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 1–30.
Aydın, G., & Baysan, S. (2018). Perceptions of postgraduate students on academic writing skills: a metaphor analysis study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 212–239.
Balanga, R. A., Fidel, I. V. B., Gumapac, M. V. G. P., Ho, H. T., Tullo, R. M. C., V., P. M. L., & Vizconde, C. J. (2016). Student beliefs towards writen corrective feedback: The case of Filipino high school students. I-Manager’s Journal o n English Language Teaching, 6(3), 22–38.
Boyle, J., Ramsay, S., & Struan, A. (2019). The Academic Writing Skills Programme: A model for technology-enhanced, blended delivery of an academic writing programme. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4), 1–12.
Can, C., & Canbulat, A. N. K. (2019). Effect of using reflective diaries in teaching Turkish on bilingual students’ academic achievement and writing skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 82, 1–26.
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39, 31–54.
Çelik, S. (2020). Building critical academic writing skills : The impact of instructor feedback on Turkish ELT graduate students. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 24(3), 1–18.
Chittum, J. R., & Bryant, L. H. (2014). Reviewing to Learn : Graduate Student Participation in the Professional Peer-Review Process to Improve Academic Writing Skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 473–484.
Chu, R. (2011). Effects of teacher‟s corrective feedback on accuracy in the oral English of Englishmajors college students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 454–459.
Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum--a case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34–47.
Demirezen, M. (2019). Identification of sentence types for writing skill in teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 98–110.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3–8.
Ghanizadeh, A., Amir, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2020). Language teaching research towards humanizing language teaching: Error treatment and EFL learners ’cognitive , behavioral, emotional engagement, motivation, and language achievement. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 129–149.
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2012). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading & Writing, 26, 1–15.
Hamouda, A. (2011). Study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. T. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128–141.
Hasbollah, H. R. B. (2010). he writing performance of undergraduates in the University of Technology Mara, Terengganu, Malaysia. Journal of Languages and Culture, 1, 8–14.
Indriyani, V., & Ramadhan, S. (2017). The development teaching of writing fable text module with project based learning (PjBL) containing characters. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 104, pp. 16–21).
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback: a critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28–52.
Khaki, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2021). Assessing the Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Process-based vs Product-based Instruction on Learners ’. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, 35–53.
Khazaal, E. N. (2019). Improving postgraduates’ academic writing skills with summarizing strategy. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 413–428.
Kır, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between the beliefs and practices of instructors about oral corrective feedback in EFL classes: A case study from Turkey. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(2), 567–583.
Lai, W. L. (2010). A new approach to teaching academic writing: How philosophers can contribute to educating young scientists. Ournal of the Graduate School of Letters, 5, 81–87.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Languag Teaching, 46(01), 1–40.
Maawa, P. K. L., & Cruz, R. O.-D. (2019). Remedial and corrective feedback strategies for improving students’ english language proficiency. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1–11.
Maawuujav, U. (2019). Developing autonomous self-editors: An alternative approach to written corrective feedback. The Catesol Journal, 31(1), 13–28.
Motlhaka, H. (2020). Blackboard collaborated-based instruction in an academic writing class: Sociocultural perspectives of learning. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(4), 337–346.
Öztürk, G. (2016). An investigation on the use of oral corrective feedback in Turkish EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 22–37.
Petchprasert, A. (2012). Feedback in second language teaching and learning. US-China Foreign Language, 21(1), 1112–1120.
Ramadhan, S., Indriyani, V., Asri, Y., & Sukma, E. (2020). Design of learning modules writing narrative text based on Project Based Learning (PjBL) by using mobile devices. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (pp. 1–9).
Rowe, A. (2011). The personal dimension in teaching: Why students value feedback. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(4), 343–360.
Saidy, C. (2015). No TitleWe learned what? Pre-service teachers as developmental writers in the writing methods class. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 4(1), 108–124.
Şakiroğlu, H. Ü. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in English communication classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 172–178.
Scott, D., Ulmer-krol, S., & Ribeiro, J. (2020). Enhancing the academic writing abilities of first-year bachelor of eEducation students in a Blended Learning environment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 87–98.
Wang, X. (2017). The effects of corrective feedback on Chinese learners ’writing accuracy : A quantitative analysis in an EFL context. World Journal of Education, 7(2), 74–88.
Wilson, A. (2012). Student engagement and the role of feedback in learning. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 1(2), 1–5.
Yakışık, B. Y. (2021). EFL Learners ’ Preferences and Emotions about Oral Corrective Feedback at Secondary Education in Turkey : Are There Gender and Grade-level Differences ? Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 103–122.
Yeh, S. (2015). Mature Taiwanese writers ’ development of writing and voices between different academic environments. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(5), 197–208.
Zaki, A. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2015). Potential of mobile learning in teaching of ESL academic writing. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 11—19.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v26i1.8652
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Vivi Indriyani, Mita Domi Fella Henanggil, Ayu Gustia Ningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
TA'DIB with registered number e-ISSN: 2580-2771, p-ISSN: 1410-8208 have been indexed on:
Journal Ta'dib distribute under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Ta'dib; Address: FTIK, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar; Jl. Sudirman No. 137 Lima Kaum Batusangkar, Tanah Datar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Email: takdib@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id