RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; PENELITIAN DI BIDANG KEPENDIDIKAN YANG INOVATIF, PRODUKTIF DAN BERMAKNA
Abstract
The focus of this paper is the research and development, as a kind of educational research that is innovative, productive and meaningful. The product of research and development in aspects, especially in education has been able to make the job easier and more enjoyable. Developing of learning as a model, curriculum and component have been able to make learning easier. Example, with the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) into the learning process, making the learning can be done in many places. Research and development can be done with various models that have been developed by experts, such as Plomp, 4-D, and Borg and Gall. The researchers were able to select and adopt it has been developed by expert. The research phase of development should have the design, development and evaluation of the product. Indeed, studies conducted have a positive contribution to the advancement and improvement of the quality of the learning process.
Kata kunci: research and development, education, inovatif, productive, meaningfullFull Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Borg, W. R., dan Gall, M. R., 1989. Education Research. New York: Longman.
Cronje, Johannes. 2006. Paradigms Regained: toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54:387-416.
Dummer, P. P., Ifenthaler, D., and Spector, J. M. 2010. Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58:3-18.
Fauzan, A. 2002. Applying Realistic Mathematics Eduaction (RME) in Teaching Geometry in Indonesian Prymary Schools. Thesis. University of Twentee. Enshede. (Tidak Diterbitkan).
Haviz M, Lufri, Helendra dan Ramadhan S. 2011a. Pengembangan Perang-kat Model Pembelajaran Koopera-tif Pada Biologi Perkembangan Hewan. Makalah Seminar Nasional dan Mubes Iluni III Biologi FMIPA UNP. Padang Panjang, 26-27 Februari 2011.
Haviz, M. 2009. Biologi Perkembangan Hewan, jilid 1. (Editor). Padang: UNP Press.
Haviz, M. 2012. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Integratif Pada Biologi Perkembangan Hewan. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana UNP. Padang. (Tidak Dipublikasi-kan)
Haviz, M., dan Maris, I. M. 2012. Pengembangan CD Interaktif Ber-orientasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Pada Biologi Perkembangan He-wan. Prosiding Penelitian Dosen STAIN Batusangkar 2011. (accepted)
Haviz, M., Lufri., Fauzan, A., Mawardi, Z. E. 2012. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Integratif Pada Biologi Perkembangan Hewan: Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembang-an Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Ta’dib Vol 15 No.1:1-14.
Haviz, M., Lufri., Helendra., dan Ramadhan, S. 2011b. Pengem-bangan Perangkat Model Pem-belajaran Kooperatif Pada Biologi Perkembangan Hewan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ta’dib Vol 14 No. 1: 7-15 (Sebagian isi, sudah dipublikasikan sebelumnya).
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., and Smaldino, S. E. 2002. Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction (7th ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Herlina, E., Kurnia, L., dan Maris., I., M. 2011. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik (PMR) di Kelas III MI se Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Kompetitif STAIN Batusangkar. (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
Jonassen, D. H. 2006. On the role of concepts in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54:177-196.
Lufri. 2004. Pemecahan Masalah dan Peta Konsep dalam Perkuliahan Perkembangan Hewan: Analisis Sikap Mahasiswa Terhadap Pem-belajaran. Jurnal Forum Pendidik 29 (02): 127-140.
Lufri. 2005. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Problem Solving yang Diintervensi dengan Peta Konsep terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran 28 (01): 47-65.
Lufri., dan Helendra. 2009. Perkem-bangan Hewan Jilid 1. Padang: UNP Press.
Lufri., dan Helendra. 2012. Biologi Perkembangan Hewan Jilid 2. Padang: UNP Press. (in publish)
Muliyardi. 2006. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Meng-gunakan Komik di Kelas 1 Se-kolah Dasar. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana. UNS. Surabaya. (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
Nerita, Siska. 2011. Pengembangan Media CD Interaktif Berorientasi Konstruktivisme Pada Pokok Bahasan Fertilisasi dalam Mata Kuliah Perkembangan Hewan untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana UNP. Padang. (Tidak Dipublikasikan).
Nieveen, Nienke. 1999. Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Dalam Plomp, T; Nieveen, N; Gustafson, K; Branch, R.M; dan van den Akker, J (eds). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Nieveen, Nienke. 2010. Formative Evaluation in Eduational Design Research. Dalam Tjeer Plom and Nienke Nieeveen (Ed). An Intro-duction to Educational Design Research. (p:9-35). Netherlands in www.slo.nl/organisatie/inter-national/ publications.
Plomp, Tjeerd. 2010. Educational Design Research: An Introduction. Dalam Tjeer Plomp and Nienke Nieeveen (Ed). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. (p:9-35). Netherlands in www.slo.nl/organisatie/internatio-nal/publications.
Putra, N. 2011. Reseacrh and DevelopmentReseacrh and Development, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Suatu Pengantar. PT. Raja Grafindo. Jakarta.
Reigeluth, C. M. 1999. Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume II: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Reigeluth, C. M., and An, Y. J. 2006. Functional contextualism: an ideal framework for theory in instructional design and techno-logy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1):49-53.
Richey, R. C., Klein, D.K and Nelson, W. A. 2002. Developmental research: studies of instructional design and development. In David Jonassen, (Eds). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd Edition). P:1101 – 1130. http://www.aect.org/edtech/42.pdf
Rochmat. 2011. Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Mate-matika. FMIPA Universitas Negeri Semarang
Sadik, Alaa. 2008. Digital storytelling: a meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56:487-506.
Seels, B. B., and Richey, R. C. 1994. Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Seok, Soonhwa. 2009. Item validation of online postsecondary courses: rating the proximity between similarity and dissimilarity among item pairs (Validation study series I: multidimensional scaling). Educational Technology Research and Development, 57:25-43.
Tessmer, M. 1993. Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London: Kogan Page.
Tessmer, M., and Richey, R. C. 1997. The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85–115.
Tezci, Erdogan. 2011. Turkish primary school teachers perceptions of school culture regarding ICT integration. Educational Techno-logy Research and Development, 59:429-443.
Tracey, M. W. 2009. Design and development research: a model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57:553-571.
Tracey, M. W., and Richey, R. C. 2007. ID model construction and validation: a multiple intelligences case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55:369-390.
Van den Akker, J. 1999. Principles and Methods of Development Research. Dalam Plomp, T; Nieveen, N; Gustafson, K; Branch, R.M; dan van den Akker, J (eds). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Weston, C., McAlpine L., and Bordonora T. 1995. A Model for understanding formative evaluati-on in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43 (3):27-48.
Williams, D.D., South, J. B., Yanchar, C.S., Wilson, B. G., and Allen, S. 2011. How do instructional designer evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59:885-907.
Yanchar, S. C., South., J. B., Williams, D. D., Allen S dan Wilson, B. G. 2010. Struggling with theory? A qualitative investigation of conceptual tool use in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58:39-60.
York, C. S and Ertmer, P. A. 2011. Towards an understanding of instructional design heuristics: an exploratory Delphy study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59:841-863
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v16i1.235
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 M. HAVIZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
TA'DIB with registered number e-ISSN: 2580-2771, p-ISSN: 1410-8208 have been indexed on:
Journal Ta'dib distribute under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Ta'dib; Address: FTIK, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar; Jl. Sudirman No. 137 Lima Kaum Batusangkar, Tanah Datar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Email: takdib@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id