USING DEBATING ACTIVITIES TO FOSTER STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILL

DENI ASRIDA

Abstract


This article discusses about the use of the debating activities in fostering students’ communication and critical thinking skills. The aims of debating are to enable the students to be active and creative in the classroom. Debating is also assumed as a valuable learning activity for teaching critical thinking and improving communication skills. Debating is an effective pedagogical way because of the level of responsibility for learning and active involvement required by all student debaters. Many teachers realize that the best strategy for motivating the students to communicate in English is by changing the situation in the class. By creating an interesting and motivating environment, the students are expected to be immersed in the activities given by the teachers. Moreover, an ideal teacher should provide opportunities for students to talk by using group work or pair work, and limiting teacher talk. Therefore, the teacher should keep encouraging the students to get involved during the process of learning in the class most of the time.


References


Bailey, Kathleen. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching: First Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2010) English Debate Training for High School Teachers in Tanah Datar. Jakarta. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.

Dobson, M Julia. 1987. Effective techniques for English conversation groups. Washington

Ennis, R. (1985). Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum, 65, 28-31.

Gieve, S. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 123-129.

Halvorsen andy 2005. Incorporating critical thinking skills development into ESL/EFL course. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Halvorsen-CriticalThinking.html Retrieved February 15, 2010 at 10:45

Hyland, Ken. 1993. Why Don’t teachers Learn What Learners Learn?-Taking The Guesswork Out With Action Logging. Washington DC.

Ilza Mayuni et al. 1995. Speaking Book III. Padang: Fakulatas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni IKIP Padang

Kennedy, Ruth. 2007. In-Class Debates: Fertile Ground for Active Learning and the Cultivation of critical Thinking and Oral Communication skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol 19, Retrieved on June 15th 2011

Krieger, Daniel 2007. Teaching debate to ESL students: a six-class unit. http://iteslj org/Techniques/Krieger-Debate.html Retrieved January 24, 2010 at 10:35

Mowbray & George. 1992. Modul 7: The art of Debating. from http://www.asked.gov.sk.ca/does/com20/mod7.html. Retrieved on July 25th 2011

Setiawan, R. 2006. Debate as a means to improve communication strategy. Jurnal ilmu-ilmu social, Vol 2 No. 1. 1858-2265.

Stall, N.N., & Stahl, R.J. (1991). We can agree after all! Achieving consensus for a critical thinking component of a gifted program using the Delphi Technique. Roeper Review, 14(2), 79-88.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v15i2.227

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 DENI ASRIDA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

TA'DIB with registered number e-ISSN: 2580-2771, p-ISSN: 1410-8208 have been indexed on:

 

Ta'dib Visitor

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal Ta'dib distribute under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.


Contact us: Ta'dib; Address: FTIK, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar; Jl. Sudirman No. 137 Lima Kaum Batusangkar, Tanah Datar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Email: takdib@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id