Prospective Biology Teachers’ View towards Theory of Evolution: A Case Study at Islamic University in Indonesia

M Haviz

Abstract


This study was to investigate prospective biology teachers' views towards the theory of evolution at Islamic university. This study was concerned to investigate the quality of the instruments, the profile of literacy, attitudes, and religiosity of PBTs-IU, and the relationship between literacy and attitude towards the theory of evolution with religiosity. An explanatory mixed method was conducted by using a quantitative survey and in-depth interviews. A total of 153 (16 males and 137 females) from 185 prospective biology teachers at Islamic University (PBTs-IU) participated in filling out the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha tests have been conducted to examine the quality of the instrument. PBTs-IU profiles were analyzed by descriptive statistical test, and a correlation test was used to determine the relationship between variables. Furthermore, triangulation was chosen to analyze the results of the interviews. The results of this study showed that the instruments used are valid and reliable, the profile of literacy, attitudes, and religiosity of PBTs-IU was high level, and there was a positive and significant relationship at the 0.01 and 0.05 levels between literacy and religiosity and attitudes and religiosity. These findings concluded that PBTs-IU have good knowledge of the theory of evolution, and PBTs-IU also have strong religious beliefs.


Keywords


Prospective biology teachers, Theory of evolution, Literacy, Attitudes, Religiosity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi, Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif (Islamic Studies in Higher Education, Integrative-Interconnective Approach). Yogyakarta: Student Libraries Press.

Ali, N. (2020). Integrating science and religion in the curriculum of Indonesian islamic higher education: A Case study of UIN Malang. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(9), 948–960. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_9/13972_Ali_2020_E_R.pdf

Ayala, F. J. (2009). Evolution by natural selection: Darwin’s gift to science and religion. Theology and Science, 7(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700903239478

Azra, A. (2015). Genealogy of Indonesian Islamic education: Roles in the Modernization of Muslim Society Heritage of Nusantara. Internasional Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 4(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v4i1.63

Barbour, I. G., College, C., & He, M. (1990). Religion in an Age of Science (Vol. 2237, Issue 1). SCM London Press.

Barnes, M. E., Dunlop, H. M., Holt, E. A., Zheng, Y., & Brownell, S. E. (2019). Evolution : Education and Outreach Different evolution acceptance instruments lead to different research findings. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0096-z

Barnes, M. E., Elser, J., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). Impact of a Short Evolution Module on Students ’ Perceived Conflict between Religion and Evolution Impact of a Short Evolution Module on Students ’ Perceived Conflict between Religion and Evolution Religion and evolution are thought to be incompatible by. The American Biology Teacher, 79(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.2.104

Barnes, M. E., Roberts, J. A., Maas, S. A., & Brownell, S. E. (2021). Muslim undergraduate biology students’ evolution acceptance in the United States. PLoS ONE, 16(8), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255588

Basel, N., Harms, U., Prechtl, H., Weiß, T., & Rothgangel, M. (2014). Students arguments on the science and religion issue: The example of evolutionary theory and Genesis. Journal of Biological Education, 48(4), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.849286

Bigliardi, S. (2014). Stenmark’s multidimensional model and the contemporary debate on islam and science. Theology and Science, 12(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2013.868117

Billingsley, B., Abedin, M., & Nassaji, M. (2020). Primary school students’ perspectives on questions that bridge science and religion: Findings from a survey study in England. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3574

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research Design; Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Method Approaches (5 ed.). In SAGE Publication (Issue 5). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=PT%0Ahttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52012PC0011:pt:NOT

Davison, A. (2020). Biological Mutualism: A Scientific Survey. Theology and Science, 18(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1755534

Downie, J. R., & Barron, N. J. (2000). Evolution and religion: Attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704

Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. In Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

El-Menouar, Y. (2014). The Five Dimensions of Muslim Religiosity . Results of an Empirical Study. Method, Data, Analyses, 8(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2014.003

Fogarty, R., & Pete, M, B. (2009). How to Integrate the Curicula. Corwin A Sage Company.

Genisa, M. U., Subali, B., Djukri, & Habibi, H. (2021). Decision-making style profiles of pre-service biology teachers in socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21376

Glaze, A. L., Goldston, M. J., & Dantzler, J. (2015). Evolution in The Southeastern USA: Factors Influencing Acceptance and Rejection in Pre-Service Science Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1189–1209. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9541-1

Glock, C. ., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Rand McNally Company.

Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The Inter-relationship of Science and Religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.853897

Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438

Haviz, M., Lufri, L., & Maris, I. M. (2020). Assessing prospective biology teachers (PBTs) perceptions on thinking as a 21st century skill: A case study at Islamic University. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24077

Hawley, P. H., Short, S. D., McCune, L. A., Osman, M. R., & Little, T. D. (2011). What’s the Matter with Kansas?: The Development and Confirmation of the Evolutionary Attitudes and Literacy Survey (EALS). Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0294-1

Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710

Kementerian Agama RI. (2019). Pedoman Implementasi Integrasi Ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam (PTKI). 73. http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/NEW/file/dokumen/2815637844553618n2019.pdf

Kızılay, E., & Hamalosmanoğlu, M. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ visual images about biology. In International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 624–629). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20255

Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2016). Insights Into the Diversity of Attitudes Concerning Evolution and Creation: A Multidimensional Approach. Science Education, 100(4), 673–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21226

Loo, S. P. (2001). Islam, science and science education: Conflict or concord? Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560167

Maknun, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Djukri, D. (2022). Guided inquiry laboratory to improve research skills of prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 2122–2128. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22104

Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ interpretations of Islamic culture related to science education versus the Islamic epistemology and ontology of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9214-5

Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20418

Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. (2012). A More Fine-Grained Measure of Students’ Acceptance of Evolution: Development of the Inventory of Student Evolution Acceptance-I-SEA. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1637–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.702235

Rachmatullah, A., Park, S., & Ha, M. (2022). Crossing borders between science and religion: Muslim Indonesian biology teachers’ perceptions of teaching the theory of evolution. In Cultural Studies of Science Education (Vol. 17, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10066-4

Reiss, M. J. (2009). The relationship between evolutionary biology and religion. Evolution, 63(7), 1934–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00714.x

Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The Development and Validation of the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution Instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x

Sanders, M., & Ngxola, N. (2009). Identifying teachers’ concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656166

Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. pedagogical issues. In Science and Education (Vol. 19, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9216-4

Stolberg, T. L. (2009). Student thinking when studying science-and-religion. Zygon: journal of religion and science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 44(4), 859–878.

Suprayogo, I. (2012). Paradigma Pengembangan Keilmuan di Perguruan Tinggi. UIN Malang Press.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Truong, J. M., Barnes, M. E., Brownell, S. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). Can Six Minutes of Culturally Competent Evolution Education Reduce Students ’ Level of Perceived Conflict Between Evolution and Religion ? Can Six Minutes of Culturally Competent Evolution Education Reduce Students ’ Level of Perceived Conflict Between Ev. 80(2), 106–115.

Yani, A., Amin, M., Rohman, F., Suarsini, E., & Rijal, M. (2021). Pre- service biology teacher ’ s perception on local environment problems as contextual learning resources. 10(3), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21091

Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding Student Approaches to Learning Evolution in the Context of their Perceptions of the Relationship between Science and Religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715315




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/js.v15i1.9342

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 M Haviz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

        

 

__________________________________________________________________________

Sainstek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi
ISSN 2085-8019  (print) | 2580-278x  (online)
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar

Email: sainstek@iainbatusangkar.ac.id


View Sainstek Stats

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.