ISLAM MODERAT DAN KONTEKSTUALISASINYA (Tinjauan Filosofis Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman)
Abstract
Weakness in understanding God's verses makes it dwarf to think exclusively in attitude. Even though the Koran textually presents God's viewpoint through its words that truth as its authority is able to explain religious understanding and practice, has shown cultural diversity (multicultural), this of course leads to differences, critical attitudes and dialogue and freedom will guarantee differences of opinion, confrontation and views and debates between developing ideas especially in building a civilization. In this paper, it will be analyzed descriptively that moderate Islam and its contextualization have a strong strategy and reason, so that by including tolerant religious values and teachings it is an inclusive movement in terms of opening thoughts that free from losing dialogue skills and the ability to be critical, making it vulnerable to provocation can be overcome. The moderate Islamic movement teaches that universal values, such as tolerance, multiculturalism, loving differences have been embodied in the Koran and Sunnah. One of them is the moderate Islamic thought that was built by Fazlurahman and his contextualization with a set of systematic and comprehensive methodologies, especially those related to the development of modern Islam, which reflects modern civilization so that in reality it leads to peace and plurality and tolerance in religion.
References
Abdad, M. Z. (2011). Pemikiran Fiqih Moderat di Timur Tengah dan Relasinya dengan Gerakan Fiqih Formalis. ISLAMICA, 6(1), 104-118.
Abdullah, A. K. (2018). Fazlur Rahman. ResearchGate,, 1-7.
Abdullah, M. A. (2017, Juli-Desember). Menengok Kembali Peran Agama di Ruang Publik, Sosiologi Agama. Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama dan Perubahan Sosial, 11(2), 157-184.
Abdullah, M. A. (2020). The Intersubjective Type Of Religiosity Theoretical Framework and Methodological Construction for Developing Human Sciences in a Progressive Muslim Perspective. Al-Jāmi‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 58(1), 63-102.
Acikgenc, A. (2011). Fazlur Rahman: Pemikir Kebangkitan Dan Pembaharuan Islam Kontemporer. AL-QALAM, XVIII (90-91), 194-221.
Açıkgenç, A. (2019). Fazlur Rahman,” The Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Science, and Technology in Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ahmad Khoirul Fata dan Siti Mahmudah Noorhayati. (2016). Sekularisme dan Tantangan Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer. Madania, 20(2), 215-228.
Ahmed, A. (2017). The Theological Thought of Fazlur Rahman. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
Ajahari. (2016). Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman Dan Muhammad Arkoun. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat, 12(2), 232-262.
Azwar, S. (2010). Metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,.
Bimbo, C. C. (2019). Islam Today In Modern West Fazlur Rahman’s and Tariq Ramadan’s Views on Jihad. Ulumuna, 23(1), 71-89.
Casram. (2016). Membangun Sikap Toleransiberagama dalam Masyarakat Plural. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 187-198.
Ervan Nurtawab dan Ahmad Baiquni. (2017). Tema-Tema Pokok al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan.
Fatikhin, R. (2017). Keadilan Sosial Dalam Perspektifal-Qur’an dan Pancasila, Panangkaran. Jurnal Penelitian Agama dan Masyarakat, 1(2), 293-313.
Formichi, C. (2010). “Pan-Islam and Religious Nationalism: The Case of Kartosuwiryo and Negara Islam Indonesia”,. Indonesia, 125-146.
Harahap, S. (2015). Islam dan Modernitas (Dari Teori Modernisasi Hingga Penegakan Kesalehan Modern). Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Hasyim, B. (2013). Islam Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan (Pengaruh Temuan Sains Terhadap Perubahan Islam). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh,, 14(1), 127-139.
Huda, S. (2014). Kritik Pemikiran Richard C. Martin dalam Studi Agama dan Relevansinyadengan Studi Islamdi Indonesia. Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama, 4(1), 96-123.
Islamiyah, D. (2017). Realitas Pemikiran Islam: Moderat-Purita. Millatī, Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 2(2), 145-168.
Izzan, A. (2011). Ulumul Qur’an: Telaah Tekstualitas dan Kontekstualitas Al-Qur’an. Bandung: 242.
Jaya, W. K. (2012). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Teori Ekonomi Kelembagaan Baru (New Institutional Economic). Malang: Majalah EBNEWS.
M. Zaenudin dan Muhamad In’am Esha. (2016). Islam Moderat :Konsepsi, Interpretasi dan Aksi. Malang: UIN Malik Press.
Muhadjir, N. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Munfarida, E. (2015). Metodologi Penafsiran al-Qur’an Menurut Fazlur Rahman. KOMUNIKA, 9(2), 243-257.
Nidhal Guessoum. (2010). Islam’s Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London:: I.B. Tauris.
Redaksi, T. (2017). Pengarusutamaan Islam Moderat di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Pendis Kementerian Agama.
Rifki Ahda Sumantri. (2013). Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Fazlur Rahman Metode Tafsir Double Movement. KOMUNIKA, 7(1), 1-10.
Setiawan, A. (2016). Hermeneutika al-Qur’an “Mazhab Yogya” (Telaah atas teori makna Cum-Maghza, dalam Penafsiran al-Qur’an). Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 17(1), 69-95.
Sofiuddin, S. (2018). Transformasi Pendidikan Islam Moderat dalam Dinamika Keumatan dan Kebangsaan. Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 18(2), 347–366.
Surakmad, W. (2012). Pengantar Ilmiah Dasar, Metode dan Teknik. Bandung : Tarsito.
Umar, A. R. (2016). A Genealogy of Moderate Islam: Governmentality and Discourses of Islam in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. Studia Islamika, 23(3), 399-433.
Wahyudi, C. (2011). Tipologi Islam Moderat dan Puritan: Pemikiran Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl,. Teosofi, 1(1), 75-92.
Widayani, H. (2020). Neomodernisme Islam dalam Perspektif Fazlur Rahman. El Afkar, 9(1), 85-100.
Zayadi, A. (2020). Menuju Islam Moderat. Yogyakarta: Cantrik Pustaka.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aat Royhatudin