COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC BANK PERFORMANCE BASED ON RGEC AND ISLAMICITY PERFORMANCE INDEX

Darwis Harahap, Rini Hayati Lubis, Siti Ena Aisyah Simbolon, Ferri Alfadri

Abstract


Comparative Analysis of Islamic Bank Performance Based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The increase in Islamic banking makes Islamic banks must be able to maintain their performance in order to survive. The performance of Islamic banks can be measured using the CAMELS method until 2013, but after the issuance of PBI Number 13/1/PBI/2011 and POJK Number 8/POJK.03/2014 regarding the assessment of the soundness of Islamic banks, Islamic banks used the RGEC method. However, the RGEC method is not able to reveal the social function of a bank. Meanwhile, Islamic banks need a measuring instrument that is able to reveal the social function of the bank. So this research uses the Islamicity Performance Index method. Therefore, the problem in the research is how to compare the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The population in this study is the financial performance report data of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk in 2016-2020. The samples in this study are financial ratios, namely NPF, FDR, GCG, ROA, CAR, PSR, ZPR, EDR, IIR, and IsIR. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique used independent sample t-test and Mann Whitney test. The result of this research is the performance of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk is better than the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk.

Keywords


Bank, RGEC, Islamicity Performance Index

Full Text:

PDF

References


Darmawi, H. (2014). Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Duantika, D. (2015). Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat Memperoleh (Skripsi). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Hameed Bin Mohamed Ibrahim, et al., (2004). Alternative Disclosure & Performance Measures For Islamic Banks. Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur: Department Of Accounting International Islamic University Malaysia.

Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2016). Manajemen Kesehatan Bank Berbasis Risiko. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ismanto, K. (2015). Manajemen Syari’ah: Implementasi TQM dalam Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Jumingan. (2011). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019, February 21). Statistik Perbankan Syariah—Desember 2018 [Web Goverment]. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from Otoritas Jasa Keuangan web: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2018.aspx

Pandia, F. (2012). Manajemen Dana dan Kesehatan Bank. Jakarta: : PT Rineka Cipta.

Tristiningtyas, V., & Mutaher, O. (2013). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan Pada Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 2(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.2.2.131-145

Umam, K. (2013). Manajemen Perbankan Syariah. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Umiyati, U., & Faly, Q. P. (2015). Pengukuran Kinerja Bank Syariah dengan Metode RGEC. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Islam, 3(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v3i2.36




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/imara.v6i2.5883

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Darwis Harahap, Rini Hayati Lubis, Siti Ena Aisyah Simbolon, Ferri Alfadri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

INDEX BY:

       

 Lisensi Creative Commons

Journal Imara distribute under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


View My Stats