Perceptions of Pamong Teachers on the Competence of Prospective Teacher in Practice Field Experience (PPL)

Eliwatis Eliwatis; Zulfani Sesmiarni; Romi Maimori; Susi Herawati; Yenti Murni

doi:10.31958/jies.v2i2.7860

Perceptions of Pamong Teachers on the Competence of Prospective Teacher in Practice Field Experience (PPL)

Eliwatis Eliwatis, Zulfani Sesmiarni, Romi Maimori, Susi Herawati, Yenti Murni

Abstract

This study aims to determine the perceptions of tutors regarding the quality of student teacher competency in field experience practice (PPL). The research was limited to PPL students in the study program of Islamic religious education, Arabic language education, English education and mathematics education in the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training at UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar. The research method uses a quantitative descriptive approach. The research instrument was a questionnaire with a Likert scale with 70 samples. The results of the study showed that the pedagogical competence of PPL students was in the category of sufficient perception, professional competence was in the good category, personality competence was in the very good category, and social competence was in the good category. The competency of PPL students with very good perceptual quality of tutors is personality competence, while the social and professional competencies of PPL students with good perceptual quality, but for PPL student pedagogical competence it is very important to improve because only perceptual quality is sufficient. These results become input for the person in charge, implementer and manager of PPL at the university.

Keywords

Competence, Prospective Teachers, PPL Students

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anom, G. A. (2020). Supervisi Edukatif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dalam Pembelajaran di SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25443

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (VI cet.14). Rineka Cipta.

Batanero, F., María, J., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

Fuadi, S. I., & Tulistiyono, F. (2022). PERSEPSI POSITIF PESERTA DIDIK TERHADAP GURU. 1(2).

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Applying Educational. Pearson Education.

Hằng, N. V. T., Hằng, N. T., & Liên, N. T. (2022). Classroom management competence of novice teachers in Vietnam. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2124042

Kamil, I. (2018). Persepsi Guru Pamong terhadap Kemampuan Mengajar Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus: SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang dan SMKN 5 Padang). Cived, 5(1), 2113–2117

Keller-Schneider, M., Zhong, H. F., & Yeung, A. S. (2020). Competence and challenge in professional development: teacher perceptions at different stages of career. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1708626

Kementrian Hukum dan HAM. (2012). UU RI No. 12/2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Undang Undang, 18.

Kruszewska, A. (2021). Teachers’ understanding of the role of key competences in working with children: a study of the perceptions of early years educators in Southern Poland. Education 3-13, 49(6), 650–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1762691

Mohamed, Z., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2017). Are they ready to teach? Student teachers’ readiness for the job with reference to teacher competence frameworks. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1257509

Mulyasa, E. (2009). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Aksit, F. (2016). Active learning promoting student teachers’ professional competences in Finland and Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1212835

Nugroho, W., & Practice, L. I. (2020). Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Kompetensi Calon Guru Matematika Pada Praktik Magang Blended Learning. 250–260.

Permendiknas. (2007). PERMENDIKNAS NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2007. 3–3.

Ruspayanti, D., Purwaningsih, E., & Achmadi, A. (2020). Persepsi Guru Pamong Terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa Jurusan Piis Yang Melakukan PPL-2 di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan …, 5(3).

Salwah, S., Ashari, N. W., Basir, F., & Cokroaminoto, U. (2019). Guru Pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Kurikulum Description of Pedagogic Competence of Prospective. 4(2), 75–84.

Saragih, M. J., Dirgantoro, K. P. S., & Siahaan, M. M. L. (2021). Membangun Pemahaman Mahasiswa Calon Guru Akan Interaksi dalam Pembelajaran Melalui Program Pengalaman Lapangan-1 di Sekolah. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11, 188–199.

Sidik Prianada. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pascal Books.

Siri, A., Supartha, I. W. G., Sukaatmadja, I. P. G., & Rahyuda, A. G. (2020). Does teacher competence and commitment improve teacher’s professionalism. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1781993

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif dan RnD. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R n D. Alfabeta.

Turmuzi, M., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Kemampuan Mengajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Ditinjau dari Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) pada Mata Kuliah Micro Teaching. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2484–2498. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.881

Yuhanni, & Rangkuti, A. N. (2021). Refleksi Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar Mahasiswa Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan IAIN Padangsidimpuan. Forum Paedagogik, 12(2), 216–230.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jies.v2i2.7860