The Judge’s Considerations in Refusing an Application for Marriage Dispensation in Respect of Very Urgent Reasons

Ashabul Fadhli, Ashabul Kahfi

Abstract


The state’s indecisiveness in defining a very urgent reason clause on a marriage dispensation application at the Religious Court opens opportunities for judges to have different views in granting or rejecting a case. The essence of the very urgent reasons regulated in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage should ideally be a barometer for judges’ considerations to determine the readiness of children to enter into marriage. This study aims to reveal the judges’ considerations in defining the very urgent reasons for the determination of law in the Bukittinggi Religious Court which are contradictory between one judge and another judge. This research departs from normative legal research based on legal documents. The approach used is a statute approach which is side by side with a qualitative approach by emphasizing on the analysis of data obtained through legal documents in the form of copies of the case for the determination of the legal dispensation of marriage at the Bukittinggi Religious Court. The results of this study prove that the judge’s powers and considerations in a marriage dispensation request with very urgent reasons produce a different output in the form of a legal determination. The judge granted case Number 26/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Bkt and rejected case Number 22/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Bkt. This phenomenon shows that the basic considerations of judges depart from various legal sources while still taking into account juridical, philosophical and sociological aspects based on the values that live in society


Keywords


Judge’s Considerations, Marriage Dispensation, Urgent Reasons

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, A. (2010). Bung Hatta dan Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Amarini, I. (2019). Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Putusan Hakim. Kosmik Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v19i1.4085

Amirulloh, L. H. (2021). Rechtsvinding Dan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Mengabulkan Dan Menolak Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah. KHULUQIYYA, 3(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v3i1.53

Aristoni, A. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Perubahan Batasan Minimal Umur Legal Policy To Change the Minimum Age Limits of. 4(1), 393–413. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3198

Barkatullah, T. P. dan A. H. (2011). Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum Studi Pemikiran Ahli Hukum Sepanjang Zaman. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dewanto, P. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2307

Diniah, H. (2007). Gerwani bukan PKI: sebuah gerakan feminisme terbesar di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: ÇarasvatiBooks.

Fadhli, A., Rahmiati, Rahmi, F., & Ramadhan, J. (2022). Politik Hukum Batas Usia Perkawinan dan Dispensasi Kawin di Indonesia. AL-QISTHU, 20(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i2.1560

Fadhli, A., & Warman, A. B. (2021). ‘Alasan Khawatir’ Pada Penetapan Hukum Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama Batusangkar ‘Reasons for Concern’ on Marriage Dispensation Decisions in Batusangkar Religious Court. Al-Ahwal, 14(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14203

Fadilah, D. (2021). Tinjauan dampak pernikahan dini dari berbagai aspek. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 14(2), 88–94.

Fajri, M. (2020). Interpretasi Perubahan Batas Minimal Usia Perkawinan Perspektif Maslahat. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v7i1.14435

Gobel, M. Van. (2021). Dispensasi Kawin Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Di Pengadilan Agama Manado. I’tisham, 1(1), 78–100.

Habibi, A. R. (2022). Dialektika Pembuktian Alasan Mendesak dalam Dispensasi Nikah dan Korelasinya terhadap Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak. Pengadilan Agama Giri Menang, (April), 1–5.

Hasan, F. A. Al, & Yusup, D. K. (2021). Dispensasi Kawin Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Menjamin Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Melalui Putusan Hakim). Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 14(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14107

Ikawati, E., & Anisa, D. (2023). Analisis Meningkatnya Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin Masa Pandemi Covid 19 di Pengadilan Agama Padangsidimpuan dan Pengadilan Agama Panyabungan. Palita, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v8i1.3198

Jasmaniar, J., & Muhdar, M. Z. (2021). Batas Usia Kawin Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 3(1), 77–87.

Kariadi, K. (2020). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Undang – Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 “Saat Ini Dan Esok.” Justisi, 6(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v6i2.971

Kurniawan, M. B., & Refiasari, D. (2022). Penafsiran Makna “Alasan Sangat Mendesak” Dalam Penolakan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin. Yudisial, 15(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.508

Lubis, L. (2021). Dispensasi Kawin Jelang Dua Tahun Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Law_Jurnal, II(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v2i1.1447

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.

Muqaffi, A., Rusdiyah, R., & Rahmi, D. (2022). Menilik Problematika Dispensasi Nikah Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Pernikahan Anak Pasca Revisi UU Perkawinan. Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 5(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v5i3.5914

Prabawati, T. D., & Rusdiana, E. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Alasan Pengajuan Dispensasi Kawin Dikaitkan Dengan Asas-Asas Perlindungan Anak. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 6(3), 1–10.

Rachmatulloh, M. A., & Syafiuddin, C. (2022). Praktik Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan (Studi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019). Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v9i1.23752

Rahman, A., Sofyan, S., & Aksi, M. J. (2022). Hakim Peradilan Agama: Refleksi Sistem Pengangkatan dan Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia Mulham Jati Aksi. Diktum, 20(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v20i1.2780

Rogaiyah. (2018). Hakim Di Peradilan Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Nomor 16K/AG/2010 dan Putusan Kasasi Nomor 110K/AG/2007). Qiyas, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.29300/qys.v3i2.1316

Setiyawan, A., & Wibawa, I. (2021). Peranan Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan Perlindungan Anak, Pengendalian Penduduk Dan Keluarga Berencana (DP3AP2KB) Kabupaten Jepara Dalam Memberikan Rekomendasi Pernikahan Dini Di Pengadilan Agama Jepara. Suara Keadilan, 22(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v22i2.8532

Shaleh, A. I., & Wisnaeni, F. (2019). Hubungan Agama Dan Negara Menurut Pancasila Dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.237-249

Suryanti, I., & Rudy, D. G. (2021). Disfungsi Dispensasi Kawin dalam Upaya Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 10(2), 782–794. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p09




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v8i1.9181

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ashabul Fadhli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 El-Hekam Indexed By: