Implications of the Pagang Gadai Contract on Disharmony Social Actors in Minangkabau Community

Syukri Iska; David David; Elsy Renie; Ifelda Nengsih

doi:10.31958/juris.v21i1.5647

Implications of the Pagang Gadai Contract on Disharmony Social Actors in Minangkabau Community

Syukri Iska, David David, Elsy Renie, Ifelda Nengsih

Abstract

This study aims to explore the implementation of the pagang gadai contract and identify its impact on the social disharmony of actors in the Minangkabau community. The category of this research is ethnography, with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with 13 people as resource persons who were determined based on purposive sampling and snowball sampling, located in 5 Nagari in Tanah Datar Regency, as a representation of the Nagari of origin of the Minangkabau people. The results of the study found that the implementation of pagang gadai as a form of part of debt and receivable transactions has many variants in processing and utilizing the results of the object of pawning land. Some are managed by the pawnbroker (the debtor) with some of the proceeds destined for the pawnbroker (the debtor), in addition, some are managed by the pawnbroker with the proceeds of the object being fully under his control. As for the impact on social relations, there has been disharmony, both internal to the pawnbroker and between the pawnbroker and the pawnbroker, which is caused by inconsistencies in the implementation of customary norms and rules, unequal paradigms in following up on awareness of mistakes in the implementation of pawning so far, and also because authoritarian leadership pattern on “mamak” as tribal head.

Keywords

Contract; Pagang Gadai; Minangkabau; Social Disharmony

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Yamani, A.-I. M. bin I. al-Kahlani as-S. (1700). Subulus Salam Syarh Bulughil Maram min Jam’i Adillatil Ahkam (Juz 3: 53).

Alting, H. (2011). Dinamika Hukum dalam Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Tanah: Masa Lalu, Kini, dan Masa Mendatang. LaksBang Pressindo bekerjasama dengan Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Khairun Ternate.

Amir, R. (2015). Gadai Tanah Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Muamalah,Gadai Perspektif Ekonomi Islam Yang, V(1), 81–90. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/673-1470-1-SM (2).pdf

Amriwan, A., Warman, K., & Andora, H. (2020). Settlement of Land Pawn Disputes Through Courts in West Sumatra. International Journal of Multicultural …, 435–443.

Atkinson, P., Hammersley, M., Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.

Barth, Ernest, N. D. (1980). Cionceptual Framework for Analysis of Race Relation: an Evaluation. The Free Press.

Citrawan, F. A. (2021). Kosep Kepemilikan Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Minangkabau. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 586–602. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2583

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Pustaka Pelajar.

Darwis, H. M. D. (2013). Harmoni dan Disharmoni Sosial Etnis di Perkotaan. SOCIUS : Jurnal Sosiologi, 14, 9–40.

David, W., & Ploeger, A. (2010). Role of Matrilineal System , Gender and Education in Traditional Farming Systems and Food Culture in West Sumatra Indonesia. 1–4.

Farani, Rabbiyatussha, Nung Radliyah, N. N. (2018). Akibat Hukum Gadai Syariah dalam Sistem Ekonomi Islam: (Studi pada Pegadaian Syariah Cabang Raden Intan). Pactum Law Journal, 1, No. 1.

Fatmi, S. R. (2018). Permohonan Tanah Ulayat di Minangkabau Menjadi Tanah Hak Milik. Lentera Hukum, 5(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i3.8291

Ghuryani, al., al-S. ‘Abd R. (2002). Ahkam al-Mu’amalat al-Maliyah fi al-Fiqh al-Islamy. al-Jami’ah al-Maftuhah.

Hae, N. Z., Marpaung, R., Setiawan, H., & Suranto, H. (2000). Konflik Multikultur: Panduan Meliput Bagi Jurnalis. Lembaga Studi Pers dan Pembangunan (LSPP).

Hamka. (1984). Islam dan Adat Minangkabau (P. P. Mas (ed.)).

Hasnaini. (2015). Tradisi Lokal Pagang Gadai Masyarakat Minangkabau dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, Vol 1, No.1

Hughes, K. J., & Batten, L. (2016). the Development of Social and Moral Responsibility in Terms of Respect for the Rights of Others. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v4i2.93

Ibrahim, A. (2012). Gala Dan Rahn: Analisis Korelasi Dari Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v1i1.716

Mahyuddin, S. (2009). Minangkabau Customary Law System Dynamics in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence. PT. Candi Cipta Paramuda.

Nurcahyono, O. H., & Astutik, D. (2018). Harmonisasi Masyarakat Adat Suku Tengger (Analisis Keberadaan Modal Sosial pada Proses Harmonisasi pada Masyarakat Adat Suku Tengger, Desa Tosari, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur). Diailektika Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiolog, 2(1), 1–12.

Nurdin, Z., & Tegnan, H. (2019). Legal Certainty in the Management of Agricultural Land Pawning in the Matrilineal Minangkabau Society, West Sumatra. Land, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land8080117

Nuriz, U. C., Sukirno, & Ananingsih, S. W. (2017). Penerapan Hukum Adat Minangkabau dalam Pembagian Warisan atas Tanah. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(1), 4–5.

Parwata, I Gede, M. N. (2019). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Gadai yang Dilakukan dengan Jaminan Barang Bergerak Bukan Milik Hak Debitur. E_journal Ilmu Hukum Kartha Wicara, 8, No. 32.

Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Perda Sumbar No. 16 Tahun 2008 tentang Tanah Ulayat.

Tono, S., Syibly, M. R., Mu’allim, A., Nurozi, A., & Purwanto, M. R. (2019). The Harmonious Relationship Between Minangkabau Custom and Islam in the Distribution of Inheritance. Al-Shajarah, (Special Issue Sharia hand Law), 39–55.

Wisnu Tri Nugroho, Dania Nalisa Indah, E. H. G. N. (2019). Upaya Memperteguh Kesatuan Bangsa Melalui Internalisasi Pemahaman Tepo Saliro sebagai Rangka Harmonisasi Hidup Bermasyarakat. Prosiding Cetak- Peran Pascasarjana Dalam Pengembangan IPTEKS Terkait Pelestarian Kebudayaan Nasional Di Era 4.0.

Zuhaili, Wahbah al. (2006). al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh (Vol. VI). Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5647