IJTIHAD HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA PADA PERKARA POLIGAMI

Ashabul Fadhli, Fathur Rahmi

Abstract


This study discuss about the ijtihad of the Religious Court Judges in providing legal considerations on cases of polygamy permit applications. Every decision on a polygamy permits that granted or not granted proves that there are efforts and hard work of judges in realizing and even interpreting primary and secondary sources of law in the trial process.  One of the copies of the case the writer found the Judge giving strict consideration between the necessity referring to the statutory basis or to the basis of fiqh. As a legal research, this research carries out library research using the juridical-normative approach. This study takes data from a copy of the case in the Supreme Court's decision3 thematically. The results of this study indicate that the judge's Ijtihad in setting aside the primary legal basis and prioritizing fiqh considerations, even the opinion of Islamic law experts, aims to attract the benefit of the applicant's household. This finding confirms that the judge's ijtihad has an important role in producing legal decisions.


Keywords


ijtihad, pertimbangan hukum, putusan hukum

References


Aisyah, N. (2018). Peranan Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Penerapan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Al-Qadau, 5, 73–92.

Anshary, M. (2010). Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia: Masalah-masalah Krusial. Pustaka Pelajar.

Budiharjo, E. W. (2013). Praktik Poligami Pegawai Negeri Sipil ditinjau dari Sistem Hukum Perkawinan. Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 8(1)

Bungin, B. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fadhli, A., & Rahmi, F. (2016). Intervensi Tuanku Terkait Praktek Nikah Siri di Nagari Kurai Taji Pariaman. 2, 155–178.

Hadi, S. (1985). Metodologi Research. Fakultas Psikologi UGM.

Hadikusuma, H. (1990). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Menurut Perundang-Undangan, Hukum Adat, Hukum Agama. Mandarmaju.

Handayani, S., Alfin, A., & Daipon, D. (2019). Implementasi Undang-Undang nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Izin Poligami di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 081/PDT.G/2013/PA.Bkt dan Perkara Nomor 0328/PDT.G.2015/PA/BKT). 04(1)

M. Ichsan. (2018). Poligami Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Kajian Tafsir Muqaranah). JURIS (Juris Ilmiah Syariah), 17(2)

Manan, A. (2006). Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Putra Grafika.

Mardani. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah. Sinar Grafika.

Mu’ammar, M. A. et. all. (2012). Studi Islam Perspektif Insider/Outsider. IRCiSoD.

Muchali, R. (2005). Wacana Poligami di Indonesia. PT. Mizan.

Mushthofa, A. H. (2019). Ijtihad Hakim Dalam Penerapan Konsep Contra Legem Pada Penetapan Perkara di Pengadilan Agama. 1(2), 1–17.

Rogaiyah. (2010). Putusan Contra Legem Sebagai Implementasi Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim di Peradilan Agama ( Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Nomor 16 K / AG / 2010 dan Putusan Kasasi Nomor 110 K / AG / 2007 ). 193–206.

Soemitro, R. H. (1985). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Soemitro, R. H. (1985). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Tiwana, M. M. (1972). al-Ijtihad wa Madha Hajatina Ilaih Fi Hadha al-‘Asr. Daar al-Kutub.

Zahra, M. A. (n.d.). Ushul al-fiqh. Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.

Salinan Perkara

Nomor 790/Pdt.G/2013/PA.SMN

Nomor 0663/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Bm

Nomor 0093/Pdt.G/2014/PTA.Mtr

Nomor 452/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Skh

Nomor 850/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Rbg

Nomor 304/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Bbs




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i2.2429

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Ashabul Fadhli, Ashabul Fadhli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Index By:

          

 

JURIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Syari'ah

ISSN 2580-2763 (online) and 1412-6109 (Print)

Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Email: juris@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.