URGENSI CHECKS AND BALANCES KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA DAN ISLAM

Bustamin Bustamin, Rony Jaya

Abstract


The reform movement opened the door to implementation of the 1945 amendment to the constitution. The urgency of the Indonesian government's control system, which included the legislative, executive and judicial institutions, was quite a concern. This condition is based on the fact that during the Orde Baru the concept of the Trias Politica Montesquieu was castrated by the authorities. Unlike the case of the Islamic constitutional system, the concept of mutual control was much more familiar when Khulafaur Rasyidin Umar bin Khattab called six (six) high-ranking friends to find a replacement. This was later considered the first Syura Institute in Islamic history. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the urgency of checks and balances in the Indonesian government system and in the Islamic state administration. This article uses a library research method with a qualitative descriptive approach, which is then analyzed using the interactive analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. The results show that following the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, the legislature, including the DPR and the DPD, has taken control of the executive and the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court as a judicial body can control each other and establish a balance between these institutions. While the Islamic constitutional system in the Fiqh study of Siyasah was already familiar with the separation of powers and the separation of powers in the institutions of Tasyri'iyah, Tanfidziyah and Qada'iyah.


Keywords


Checks and Balances, Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan Islam

References


A.Djazuli. (2003). Fiqh Siyasah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

A.R, F. Y. (2012). Mekanisme Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia pasca-Amandemen UUD 1945. Simbur Cahaya, XIX(49), 3245–3258.

Al-Maududi A.A. (1993). Sistem Politik Islam Cet II. Bandung: Mizan.

Audah, A. Q. (1957). Al-Islam wa Audhauna al-Siyasah. Kairo: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.

Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bungin Burhan. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Gaffar, J. M. (2009). Kedudukan dan Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahakamah Konstitusi.

Indonesia, P. Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (amandemen IV), 4 § (1945).

Iqbal, M. (2014). Fiqh Siyasah (Kontekstualisasi Doktrin Politik Islam). Jakarta: Prenada media Group.

Khaliq, F. A. (2005). Fikih Politik Islam. Jakarta: Amzah.

Kun Budianto. (2017). Kelembagaan Politik Islam: Konsep Konstitusi, Legislasi, Demokrasi, Ummah Dan Syura. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 1(2), 155–166.

Mawardi, M. A. (2008). Pengawasan dan Keseimbangan antara DPR dan Presiden dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 15(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art3

Miles, Huberman, dan S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A method Sourcebook. america: United State of Amerika.

Moh Mahfud MD. (2011). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Montisa Mariana. (2017). Check And Balances Antar Lembaga Negara Di Dalam Sistem Politik Indonesia. Logika, 1(9), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Paydar, M. (2003). Legitimasi Negara Islam. (Yogyakarta: Fajar Pustaka Baru.

Pigome, M. (2011). Implementasi Prinsip Demokrasi Dan Nomokrasi Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Ri Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.2.191

Pirmansyah, M. (2014). Eksistensi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dalam Sistem Bikameral Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Rahmatullah, I. (2013). Rejuvinasi Sistem Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.2992

Ridwan, H. (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Shobron, A. H. S. dan S. (2016). Konsep Syura Menurut Hamka Dan M. Quraish Shihab. Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 3(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v3i2.1144

Sunarto. (2016). Prinsip Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(2), 157–163.

Suparman, F. (2016). Meluruskan Fakta Sejarah Lengsernya Gus Dur. Retrieved fromhttps://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/340330/meluruskan-fakta-sejarah-lengsernya-gus-dur

Thaib, D. (2003). Menuju Parlemen Bikameral (Studi Konstitusional Perubahan Ketiga UUD 1945). Jurnal Hukum, 10(23), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss23.art5

Thontowi, J. (2011). Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 18(2), 185–302. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art8

Warjiati, S. (2012). Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 2(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2012.2.2.185-207

Zed, M. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/juris.v18i2.1740

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Bustamin Bustamin, Rony Jaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Index By:

          

 

JURIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Syari'ah

ISSN 2580-2763 (online) and 1412-6109 (Print)

Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Email: juris@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.