STUDI EKSPLORATIF TERHADAP LAPORAN HASIL PEMERIKSAAN KABUPATEN/KOTA YANG MEMPEROLEH OPINI WAJAR DENGAN PENGECUALIAN MENGGUNAKAN CONTENT ANALYSIS

Vita Fitria Sari

Abstract


According to BPK (2009), most of the audited financial statements of the Indonesia’s local government have obtained qualified opinion from BPK. It is useful to explore what such accounts that make the reports qualified by BPK. This study aims to exploratory identify in order to know accounts that appear frequently as being qualified by BPK. Such knowledge would be useful for mapping the problems related to the quality of financial reporting of the local governments. Previous research on governmental financial reporting not yet addressed this necessity. Although this study does not go further to explain the reasons for the qualification, the obtained knowledge would help the local government to set policy for enhancing the quality f their financial reporting. Content analysis undertaken explores that the accounts that are frequently qualified from balanced sheet are assets especially current assets, while from the budget realization reports are expenditures especially operating expenditure. The problems inherent in the qualified accounts associated with the criteria of fairness of local government’s financial statements included the incompatibility with government accounting standards in Indonesia, non-compliance with laws and regulations and weaknesses of internal control system. While the insufficiency of disclosure did not became a problem in the qualified accounts on the participant’s financial statements.

Keywords


BPK audit reports, local government financial statements, unqualified opinion, content analysis, qualified accounts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. 2009. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2009. Jakarta. Diakses 9 Februari 2010 jam 10;27 AM

Bawhede, Heidi Vander. 2001. What Factors Influence Financial Statement Quality? A Framework and Some Empirical Evidence. Diakses 12 Maret 2010

Jam 6;10 PM http://venus.unive.it/bauhaus/Heidi%20Vander%20Bauwhede.PDF>

Bowo. 2009. Hasil Audit BPK. Diakses 27 April 2010 jam 8;08 PM.

Carpenter, Vivian L dan Ehsan H. Feroz. 1992. GAAP As ASymbols Of Legitimacy: New York State’s Decision To Adopt Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1992. Diakses 9 Maret 2010 jam 7;59 PM

Chan, James L. 2003. Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards. Public Money And Management January 2003.

Churyk, Natalie Tatiana dan Chih-Chen Lee, B. Douglas Clinton. 2008. Can We Detect Fraud Earlier? A Technique Called Content Analysis Raises The Possibility. Strategic Finance, October 2008. Diakses 30 April 2010 jam 8;40 PM

Hapsari, Andhisa Setya. 2008. Tinjauan Kebermanfaatan Laporan Keuangan Auditan BPK (Refleksi Eksistensi dan Peranan BPK). Diakses 17 Maret 2010 jam 7;47 PM

Jones, Rowan dan Maurice Pendlebury. 2000. Public Sector Accounting 5th edition. Prentice Hall

Mahmudi. 2007. Analisis Laporan Keuangan Daerah: Panduan Bagi Eksekutif, DPRD, dan Masyarakat dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Politik. UPP STIM YKPN.

Mardiasmo. 2006. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta.

Obaidat, Ahmad N. 2007. Accounting Information Qualitative Characteristic Gap: Evidence from Jordan. International Management Review Vol.3 No.2 2007. Diakses 2 April 2010 jam 9;09 AM

Palmquist, Mike. (????). An Introduction to Content Analysis. Diakses 28 Juli 2010 jam 8;44 PM

Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan

_____ Undang-undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara

Saidin, Saidatur Fauzi. 2007. Audit Committee Characteristics and Quality of Unaudited Financial Accounts. Diakses 10 Maret 2010 jam 11;28 AM. http://eprints.usm.my/7837/1/AUDIT_COMMITTEE_CHARACTERISTICS_AND_QUALITY_OF_UNAUDITED_FINANCIAL_ACCOUNTS.pdf

Sekaran, Uma. 2000. Research Methods for Business 5th Edition. John Wiley& Sons

Sutcliffe, Paul. 2003. The Standard Programme of IFAC’s Public Sector Committee. Public Money & Management Oxford: Jan 2003. Vol. 23, Edisi 1; pg. 29, 8 pgs. Diakses 7 April 2010 jam 1;31 PM




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/juris.v11i2.1116

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Vita Fitria Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Index By:

          

 

JURIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Syari'ah

ISSN 2580-2763 (online) and 1412-6109 (Print)

Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Email: juris@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.